Claims

Learners value classroom listening practice and prefer video or equal weighting over audio-only materials

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? All 36 respondents rated classroom listening/audiovisual practice as very (44.4%) or very much (55.6%) important; 58.3% had no audio/video preference, 30.6% preferred video, 11.1% audio. → Núñez 2017

Evidence

Núñez 2017

Casañ Núñez, J. C. (2017). Testing audiovisual comprehension tasks with questions embedded in videos as subtitles: a pilot multimethod study. The EUROCALL Review, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.4995/eurocall.2017.7062

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Frequency analysis of the first questionnaire completed by 36 of the 41 informants; the article says the results support the idea that video should prevail over audio or at least have similar weight.

"Most students (21 / 58.3%) reported that they did not have a preference for audio or video materials for practising listening/audiovisual comprehension in the classroom. In addition, many more participants showed a predilection for video (11 / 30.6%) instead of audio (4 / 11.1%)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.