eMINTS has potentially positive effects on general mathematics achievement (improvement index +2 across two studies)¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Across two studies meeting WWC standards with reservations, implementing eMINTS may increase general mathematics achievement, with an average improvement index of +2 percentile points. → What Works Clearinghouse 2020

Evidence¶

What Works Clearinghouse 2020¶

What Works Clearinghouse, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. (2020). eMINTS Comprehensive Program Intervention Report │ Teacher Excellence Topic Area. NCEE WWC 2020-011. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/InterventionReport/705

q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r1

WWC synthesis of two studies (Brandt et al., 2013; Martin et al., 2009) meeting group design standards with reservations, based on 3,096 students. The effectiveness rating is "Potentially positive effects" with improvement index "+2"; the report notes a positive improvement index does not necessarily mean the estimated effect is statistically significant.

"General mathematics achievement Potentially positive effects +2 2 3,096"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Brandt et al. (2013) finds a statistically significant positive effect of eMINTS on seventh- and eighth-grade mathematics achievement — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
• Martin et al. (2009) finds indeterminate effects of eMINTS on both mathematics and literacy achievement in grades 4–5 — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
• Core-Plus Mathematics has potentially positive effects on mathematics achievement for high school students, with an average improvement index of +15 percentile points — related
• eMINTS shows no discernible effects on general literacy achievement — related
• Both included studies report high-fidelity implementation of eMINTS — related