Academic engagement and regulation of behavior and context show incremental validity over cognitive predictors of university GPA¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Academic engagement and MSLQ Factor 2 (regulation of behavior and context) remained significant predictors of GPA after cognitive predictors were added. → Juan-Carlos Pérez-González 2022
Evidence¶
Juan-Carlos Pérez-González 2022¶
Juan-Carlos Pérez-González, Gemma Filella, Anna Soldevila, Yasmine Faiad, Maria-Jose Sanchez-Ruiz. (2022). Integrating self-regulated learning and individual differences in the prediction of university academic achievement across a three-year-long degree. Metacognition and Learning (2022) 17:1141–1165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-022-09315-w
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Authors' interpretation of the Step 2 regression results, reporting "unique incremental validity of academic engagement and regulation of behavior and context" over previous AP, inductive reasoning, and MSLQ Factor 1; in the printed tables these variables retained significant β values in Step 2 for years 1 and 3, and MSLQ Factor 2 for all three years.
"step 2 in the hierarchical regressions has revealed the unique incremental validity of academic engagement and regulation of behavior and context (MSLQ Factor 2) over and above cognitive variables such as previous AP, inductive reasoning and regulation of cognition and metacognition"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- A reduced set of non-cognitive factors alone explains 17–25% of the variance in university GPA across three years of a degree
- A latent global non-cognitive factor predicts a latent three-year GPA factor, explaining 27–29% of its variance — related
- Previous academic performance is the strongest predictor of university GPA, and adding cognitive predictors raises explained variance to about 44–50% — related
- Cognitive ability (inductive reasoning) showed no significant association with university GPA in any analysis — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
engagement-and-behavior-context-regulation-incremental-validity |
title |
Academic engagement and regulation of behavior and context show incremental validity over cognitive predictors of university GPA |
description |
Academic engagement and regulation of behavior and context show incremental validity over cognitive predictors of university GPA |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2022 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — juan-carlos-pérez-gonzález-2022 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.