English pronunciation self-efficacy partially mediates the association between GenAI-based pronunciation feedback perceptions and willingness to communicate, with the indirect effect accounting for 69.9% of the total effect¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 2 studies · 2 associationalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The indirect effect of GenAI feedback on WTC through EPSE is statistically significant (β = 0.401). → Lu Y 2026
q2 i? The indirect effect accounts for about 69.9% of the total effect of GenAI feedback on WTC, while the direct effect remains significant. → Lu Y 2026 (2)
Evidence¶
Lu Y 2026¶
Lu Y, Yang Y, Cui T, Yang Z, Cai Y and Jing B (2026) Associations between generative AI–based pronunciation feedback and willingness to communicate in English: the mediating role of English pronunciation self-efficacy. Front. Psychol. 17:1918980. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1918980
q2 · i? · associational · r2
Mediation analysis using bootstrapped path analysis with 5,000 resamples in the study's SEM on 1,701 respondents. The indirect effect through EPSE was significant, "β = 0.401", with a bias-corrected 95% CI excluding zero.
"the mediation effect of EPSE was statistically significant, with B = 0.436 and β = 0.401. The bias-corrected 95% confidence interval did not include zero [0.390, 0.490], p < 0.001."
Lu Y 2026 (2)¶
Lu Y, Yang Y, Cui T, Yang Z, Cai Y and Jing B (2026) Associations between generative AI–based pronunciation feedback and willingness to communicate in English: the mediating role of English pronunciation self-efficacy. Front. Psychol. 17:1918980. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1918980
q2 · i? · associational · r2
Total-effect analysis reported alongside the mediation results: the total effect of GenAI feedback on WTC was significant (B = 0.624, β = 0.574), and "the indirect effect is 0.401, accounting for about 69.9% of the total effect".
"the mediation anal -ysis shows that the indirect effect is 0.401, accounting for about 69.9% of the total effect, suggesting that the EPSE plays a substantial role in the relationship between GenAI Feedback and WTC."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Studies directly measuring WTC consistently report positive effects of AI on EFL learners' WTC across tool types, contexts, and age groups — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it
- GenAI feedback perceptions, pronunciation self-efficacy, and WTC are all positively intercorrelated, and learners report positive feedback perceptions and moderate self-efficacy and WTC — related
- English pronunciation self-efficacy is strongly and positively associated with willingness to communicate in English among Chinese EFL learners — related
- Chinese EFL learners' positive perceptions of GenAI-based pronunciation feedback are positively associated with their English pronunciation self-efficacy — related
- Trust in AI and academic self-efficacy serially mediate the literacy-to-continued-use association (literacy → trust → self-efficacy → use) — related
- Vocabulary mediates the association between academic self-efficacy and listening comprehension — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
epse-partially-mediate-genai-feedback-wtc |
title |
English pronunciation self-efficacy partially mediates the association between GenAI-based pronunciation feedback perceptions and willingness to communicate, with the indirect effect accounting for 69.9% of the total effect |
description |
English pronunciation self-efficacy partially mediates the association between GenAI-based pronunciation feedback perceptions and willingness to communicate, with the indirect effect accounting for 69.9% of the total... |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — lu-y-2026, lu-y-2026-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.