Existing instruments cover justice and beneficence but show gaps regarding nonmaleficence and student autonomy¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr3·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2029: tool and model accuracy changes quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? When evaluated against universal ethical principles, most instruments including the TCPERSS reflect justice and beneficence, but significant gaps remain regarding nonmaleficence and student autonomy. → Chaimo Kesinee 2026
Evidence¶
Chaimo Kesinee 2026¶
Chaimo Kesinee, Thanasilp Sureeporn. (2026). Psychometric properties of instruments assessing the ethics of teaching: a COSMIN-based systematic review. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions. https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2026.23.12
q2 · i? · review · r3
The review's interpretive evaluation of instrument content coverage against universal ethical principles. It reports instruments "effectively reflect justice and beneficence" while "significant gaps remain regarding nonmaleficence and student autonomy," citing absent items on harassment protection and student dissent in clinical contexts.
"When evaluated against universal ethical principles, most instruments, including the TCPERSS, effectively reflect justice and beneficence. However, significant gaps remain regarding nonmaleficence and student autonomy."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The TCPERSS is identified as one of the most promising instruments for the health professions education context because of its teacher–student relations focus and multisource Student Form — related
- A COSMIN-based systematic review identified 6 instruments assessing the ethics of teaching from 246 records — a broader claim this one bears on
- Existing legal and sector guidance each address only part of ethical learning analytics governance, and none integrates all six LEAGUE dimensions — related
- No existing ethics-of-teaching instrument was developed specifically for health professions education — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.