Claims

The TCPERSS is identified as one of the most promising instruments for the health professions education context because of its teacher–student relations focus and multisource Student Form

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The review judges the TCPERSS one of the most promising instruments currently available for health professions education, partly because it incorporates a Student Form providing a more objective reflection of role modeling than self-assessment alone. → Chaimo Kesinee 2026

Evidence

Chaimo Kesinee 2026

Chaimo Kesinee, Thanasilp Sureeporn. (2026). Psychometric properties of instruments assessing the ethics of teaching: a COSMIN-based systematic review. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions. https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2026.23.12

q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r1

The review's interpretive synthesis (Discussion), not a tested comparison. It reports the TCPERSS "appears to be one of the most promising instruments currently available for the health professions education context," citing its dual teacher and student forms and α=0.94–0.97.

"Accordingly, this study suggests that the Teachers’ Compliance with Professional Ethics in Relations with Students Scale (TCPERSS) appears to be one of the most promising instruments currently available for the health professions education context [16]."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.