No existing ethics-of-teaching instrument was developed specifically for health professions education¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr3·q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? None of the 6 identified instruments were specifically designed for health professions education, leaving a measurement gap for clinical instruction and workplace-based learning. → Chaimo Kesinee 2026
Evidence¶
Chaimo Kesinee 2026¶
Chaimo Kesinee, Thanasilp Sureeporn. (2026). Psychometric properties of instruments assessing the ethics of teaching: a COSMIN-based systematic review. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions. https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2026.23.12
q3 · i? · review · r3
Synthesis of measurement properties across the 6 included instruments. The review reports that despite acceptable psychometric support, "none were specifically designed for health professions education," and most focused on classroom pedagogy rather than clinical instruction.
"Although the instruments demonstrated acceptable psychometric support within their respective validation contexts, none were specifically designed for health professions education."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- There is a lack of standardized, culturally adapted, psychometrically robust assessment tools tailored to postgraduate mental health nursing — related
- A COSMIN-based systematic review identified 6 instruments assessing the ethics of teaching from 246 records — related
- All 6 instruments received only moderate-quality GRADE evidence due to single-study evidence, limited cross-context validation, and absent temporal stability data — related
- Instruments show great heterogeneity in measurement quality, with validity or reliability information lacking in many cases — related
- Included ethics-of-teaching instruments show acceptable-to-excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α=0.74–0.97) and supported structural validity — related
- The TCPERSS is identified as one of the most promising instruments for the health professions education context because of its teacher–student relations focus and multisource Student Form — related
- Existing instruments cover justice and beneficence but show gaps regarding nonmaleficence and student autonomy — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.