Claims

The exam instrument showed acceptable reliability with a Cronbach coefficient of 0.82

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2015: tool and model accuracy changes quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Reliability of the final exam was supported by a calculated Cronbach coefficient of 0.82. → Mosalanejad 2012

Evidence

Mosalanejad 2012

Mosalanejad, L.; Shahsavari, S.; Sobhanian, S.; & Dastpak, M. (2012). The effect of virtual versus traditional learning in achieving competency-based skills. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 13(2). https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/tojde

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Methods-section report on the multiple-choice theoretical exam and OSCE checklists used in both groups; validity was tied to the ministry-approved syllabus and reliability was estimated at a Cronbach coefficient of 0.82.

"The exam validity was considered based on educational aims mentioned in syllabus approved by ministry of Sience Research and Technology, and for reliability of the exam a Cronbach coefficient of 0.82 was calculated."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.