Claims

The level determination exam (DBS) used to check prior knowledge showed high internal consistency (0.822)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2021: tool and model accuracy changes quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The 23-item DBS test had an internal consistency coefficient of 0.822 and was considered highly reliable. → Seval Deniz KILIÇ & Hüseyin ALKAN 2018

Evidence

Seval Deniz KILIÇ & Hüseyin ALKAN 2018

Seval Deniz KILIÇ & Hüseyin ALKAN. (2018). The Effects of Activities and Approachments Intended Performance Improvement on the Students' Performances in Mathematics. Journal of Education and Learning, 7(5). https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v7n5p146

q2 · i? · causal · r2

The DBS was piloted on 150 students in the 2009-2010 school year; low-reliability questions were excluded, yielding a 23-item test with internal consistency of 0.822, later reduced to 21 items after two probability and statistics questions were discarded.

"Thus, the test consisting of 23 questions with high reliability was formed. The internal consistency coefficient of the test was found to be 0.822. As a result, the test was considered to be highly reliable"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.