A scoping review found no existing teacher-education digital frameworks include more than passing mention of dispositions or safety/wellbeing considerations¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoretical r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? In the author's scoping review of frequently used teacher-education frameworks, none included more than a passing mention of personal dispositions/attitudes or wider safety and wellbeing considerations as components of digital competence. → Garry Falloon 2020

Evidence¶

Garry Falloon 2020¶

Garry Falloon. (2020). From digital literacy to digital competence: the teacher digital competency (TDC) framework. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09767-4

q2 · i? · theoretical · r3

A scoping review using a multi-database keyword search selected frequently occurring frameworks aligned with teacher education and analysed them against a holistic interpretation of digital competence, with emphasis levels coded for skills, pedagogy, curriculum, dispositions and personal considerations. The review found "no existing frameworks included more than a passing mention" of dispositions or safety and wellbeing.

"Notably, no existing frameworks included more than a passing mention of personal dispositions/attitudes or understandings of wider issues or safety and wellbeing (etc.) considerations, as components of teacher education students' digital competence."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Student-facing AI raises serious wellbeing, equity, and safety concerns, and some educators express more confidence in teacher-facing tools — related
• Dispositions such as positivity, lifelong learning orientation, and persistence are reported as essential for ID/ET practice — related
• Interpersonal skills, including communication, active listening, and gaining buy-in, are heavily emphasized by ID/ET professionals — related
• Existing digital citizenship and online safety frameworks were appraised as too broad and not addressing serious online risks — related
• No included ITS study considered AI ethics, and the review calls for longer interventions, larger and more diverse samples, and ethical investigation — related