In Experiment 1, task-selection accuracy during the no-feedback test phase did not differ between feedback and control conditions¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2019 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Because expected self-assessment improvement did not occur, task-selection accuracy in the test phase showed no significant differences between conditions. → Steven F. Raaijmakers 2019
Evidence¶
Steven F. Raaijmakers 2019¶
Steven F. Raaijmakers, Martine Baars, Fred Paas, Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer, Tamara van Gog. (2019). Effects of self-assessment feedback on self-assessment and task-selection accuracy. Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-019-09189-5
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Test-phase analysis in Experiment 1 (n = 108 analyzed) found no significant condition differences in task-selection accuracy: "no significant differences between conditions". Equivalence was not tested.
"the ANOV A on task-selection accuracy in the test phase showed no significant differences between conditions,F(2, 105) = 0.50, p =. 6 0 6 ,η2 p =. 0 0 9 ."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- In Experiment 2, task-selection accuracy during the learning phase did not differ between feedback and control conditions, unlike Experiment 1 — related
- In Experiment 2, neither self-assessment feedback plus correct answers nor plus contrasting own with correct answers improved test-phase self-assessment accuracy — related
- In Experiment 1, receiving self-assessment feedback during the learning phase led to less accurate task selection than no feedback, despite feedback stating actual performance — related
- Across both experiments, self-assessment feedback failed to improve self-assessment accuracy in the absence of feedback, and learners' self-assessments did not track practice-driven performance gains — a broader claim this one bears on
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
exp1-test-phase-task-selection-null |
title |
In Experiment 1, task-selection accuracy during the no-feedback test phase did not differ between feedback and control conditions |
description |
In Experiment 1, task-selection accuracy during the no-feedback test phase did not differ between feedback and control conditions |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2019 |
source_checked |
2026-10-20 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — steven-f-raaijmakers-2019 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.