In Experiment 1, receiving self-assessment feedback during the learning phase led to less accurate task selection than no feedback, despite feedback stating actual performance¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3·i2medium
Currency · newest study 2019 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i2 Task selections during the learning phase were significantly less accurate in the feedback conditions than in the control condition (d = 0.46), contrary to Hypothesis 1. → Steven F. Raaijmakers 2019
Evidence¶
Steven F. Raaijmakers 2019¶
Steven F. Raaijmakers, Martine Baars, Fred Paas, Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer, Tamara van Gog. (2019). Effects of self-assessment feedback on self-assessment and task-selection accuracy. Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-019-09189-5
q3 · i2 · causal · r2
Planned contrast in the 108-participant Experiment 1 showed feedback conditions selected less accurately than control, d = 0.46: "task selections were less accurate instead of more accurate in the experimental conditions compared to the control condition". Of all feedback instances, 73% were negative.
"an ANOV A with a planned contrast (general self-assessment condition and specific self-assessment condition vs. control condition) on task-selection accuracy during the learning phase was conducted, which showed that the difference between the experimental conditions and the control condition during the learning phase was significant, t(105) = 2.34, p =. 0 2 1 ,d = 0.46. However, in contrast to our hypothesis, task selections were less accurate instead of more accurate in the experimental conditions compared to the control condition"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- In Experiment 1, task-selection accuracy during the no-feedback test phase did not differ between feedback and control conditions — related
- In Experiment 1, general self-assessment feedback during a learning phase led to less accurate self-assessment in a subsequent no-feedback test phase than receiving no feedback at all — related
- In Experiment 2, task-selection accuracy during the learning phase did not differ between feedback and control conditions, unlike Experiment 1 — related
- Across both experiments, self-assessment feedback failed to improve self-assessment accuracy in the absence of feedback, and learners' self-assessments did not track practice-driven performance gains — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
self-assessment-feedback-reduced-learning-phase-task-selection |
title |
In Experiment 1, receiving self-assessment feedback during the learning phase led to less accurate task selection than no feedback, despite feedback stating actual performance |
description |
In Experiment 1, receiving self-assessment feedback during the learning phase led to less accurate task selection than no feedback, despite feedback stating actual performance |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2019 |
source_checked |
2026-10-20 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — steven-f-raaijmakers-2019 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.