Experimental class outperforms control class across all Bloom's taxonomy cognitive process categories in physics¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? The experimental class achieved higher percentages than the control class in every cognitive process category: understand (C2), apply (C3), evaluate (C5), and create (C6). → Sahhyar & Nst 2017

Evidence¶

Sahhyar & Nst 2017¶

Sahhyar & Nst, F. H. (2017). The Effect of Scientific Inquiry Learning Model Based on Conceptual Change on Physics Cognitive Competence and Science Process Skill (SPS) of Students at Senior High School. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(5), 120-126. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1133077

q3 · i? · causal · r1

Post-test PCC scores were categorized by revised Bloom's taxonomy levels. Experimental class percentages: understand 69%, apply 67%, evaluate 53%, create 56%. Control class: understand 54%, apply 41%, evaluate 44%, create 32%. The study reports "the percentage of each category in physics cognitive competence was higher in the experimental class than in the control class."

"According to the results given in Table 7 showed the percentage of each category in physics cognitive competence was higher in the experimental class than in the control class."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Experimental class outperforms control class on every individual science process skill indicator — related
• Experimental class shows higher average SPS observation percentages across all three meetings — related
• Student-authored physics questions mostly require application or analysis, with under 5% at the lowest recall level — related