Claims

Experimental-group students showed a larger positive shift in collaboration attitudes across criteria than control-group students after the intervention

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Per-criterion changes in student self-assessment ranged from 2% to 19% in the experimental group versus 2% to 8% in the control group, with both groups declining only on confidence in collaboration. → Vassilios Giannakos & Maria Darra 2019

Evidence

Vassilios Giannakos & Maria Darra 2019

Vassilios Giannakos & Maria Darra. (2019). The Contribution of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning to the Development of Collaboration Between Students: Results of Pilot Implementation in Greek Secondary Education. International Education Studies, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v12n3p158

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Comparison of pre/post student self-assessment rubric changes between the 25-student experimental and 25-student control groups (Table 4). The article reports the experimental group's variation "ranged from 2% to 19% per criterion" against 2% to 8% for the control group, and notes both groups' views declined from 84% to 82% only on confidence. Descriptive percentages; no test reported.

"the variation in the experimental group ranged from 2% to 19% per criterion, while the control group differentiation ranged from 2% to 8% per criterion"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.