Teacher-rated collaboration skills of experimental-group students reached good-to-excellent levels across all rubric criteria during the wiki-supported intervention¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Teacher-completed collaboration assessment rubrics, informed by wiki pbworks activity logs and classroom observation, rated experimental-group students good to excellent on all seven criteria, with scores from 95 to 107 out of 125. → Vassilios Giannakos & Maria Darra 2019

Evidence¶

Vassilios Giannakos & Maria Darra 2019¶

Vassilios Giannakos & Maria Darra. (2019). The Contribution of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning to the Development of Collaboration Between Students: Results of Pilot Implementation in Greek Secondary Education. International Education Studies, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v12n3p158

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Teacher assessment of the 25 experimental-group students during the intervention, using the wiki pbworks Recent Activity mode and classroom observation. The article reports scores ranging from "95/125 points to 107/125 points" across the seven criteria of Table 1. Descriptive ratings only; no statistical test is reported.

"pupils’ development of collaboration skills, as members of their teams, was good to excellent in all the criteria, as scores ranged from 95/125 points to 107/125 points"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Experimental-group students showed a larger positive shift in collaboration attitudes across criteria than control-group students after the intervention — related
• Experimental-group students' attitudes toward collaboration became more positive after a wiki-supported CSCL intervention in Lyceum Literature teaching — related