Claims

The experimental group's text production improved significantly from pre-test to post-test

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Within the experimental group, post-test performance was significantly higher than pre-test performance (p = 0.012 < 0.05). → Demény 2012

Evidence

Demény 2012

Paraschiva Demény. (2012). Developing Written Text Production Competence Using the Reader-Response Method. Acta Didactica Napocensia, Volume 5, Number 3. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1054357

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Within-group comparison for the experimental group across the five-month program: pre-test mean 7.62 (SD 1.78), post-test mean 8.57 (SD 1.50), t reported in Table 3 with "p= 0.012<0.05".

"As clearly shown by table 3 and chart 3 the difference is significant (p= 0.012<0.05) fact that proves the efficiency of the employed development program."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.