A five-month reader-response-based development program improved third graders' written text production competence relative to a control group¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? After the reader-response intervention, the experimental group significantly outperformed the control group on the written text production post-test (p < 0.05). → Demény 2012

Evidence¶

Demény 2012¶

Paraschiva Demény. (2012). Developing Written Text Production Competence Using the Reader-Response Method. Acta Didactica Napocensia, Volume 5, Number 3. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1054357

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Quasi-experiment in two Cluj-Napoca schools with third graders of similar social background; experimental group received a five-month process-reading program. Post-test means were 8.57 vs 7.03, "the value of p was 0.002".

"The results of the post-test showed a significant improvement of the experimental group (experimental group performan ce: 85.7%, control group: 70.3%, the value of p was 0.002, thus p<0.05)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• The experimental group's text production improved significantly from pre-test to post-test — related
• Before the intervention, experimental and control groups showed no statistically significant difference in written text production — related