Claims

The experimental group showed a significant pre-to-post gain in reading comprehension after presentation strategy instruction

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? A paired-samples t-test on the experimental group's pre- and post-test scores was significant (t = 20.018, df = 30, sig. .000), with a mean paired difference of 9.677. → Hooshang Khoshsima & Forouzan Rezaeiantiyar 2014

Evidence

Hooshang Khoshsima & Forouzan Rezaeiantiyar 2014

Hooshang Khoshsima & Forouzan Rezaeiantiyar. (2014). The Effect of Presentation Strategy on Reading Comprehension of Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.5n.3p.101

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Paired-samples t-test (Table 4) comparing the experimental group's reading comprehension pre- and post-test scores: mean paired difference 9.677, t = 20.018, df = 30, Sig. (2-tailed) .000. The article reports the difference as significant; no standardized effect size is printed.

"Pre-and post-test 9.677 1.301 .234 -5.155 -4.200 20.018 30 .000"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.