Claims

The video-instructed experimental group improved significantly from pre-test to post-test

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? A paired-samples t-test showed a statistically significant pre-to-post gain in overall reading for the experimental group (p = 0.000), in favor of post-test scores. → Mohammadian et al. 2018

Evidence

Mohammadian et al. 2018

Amir Mohammadian, Amin Saed, Younes Shahi. (2018). The Effect of Using Video Technology on Improving Reading Comprehension of Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.9n.2p.17

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Paired-samples t-test within the 15-member experimental group using educational video files. Means rose from 19.07 to 23.80; the article reports the difference as significant at the 0.01 level. No effect size is printed.

"there are statistically significant differences at 0.01 levels in overall reading between the mean scores of the experimental group on the pretest and the post- test in favor of the post- test scores since the estimated p values 0.00 was lower than 0.05 (0.00<0.05)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.