Experimental group mean scientific literacy score of 21.3967 versus control group mean of 11.8943¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? The experimental group's mean scientific literacy score (21.3967, SD 6.08479) exceeded the control group's mean (11.8943, SD 5.12438). → Al-Rsa'i 2013

Evidence¶

Al-Rsa'i 2013¶

Al-Rsa'i, M. S. (2013). Promoting Scientific Literacy by Using ICT in Science Teaching. International Education Studies, 6(9). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v6n9p175

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Descriptive statistics from Table 1 of the quasi-experiment: the control group (N = 123) had mean 11.8943 and standard deviation 5.12438, while the experimental group (N = 121) had mean 21.3967 and standard deviation 6.08479. These are descriptive means; the article prints no effect size for the difference.

"Control 123 11.8943 5.12438 Experimental 121 21.3967 6.08479"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• The experimental group's RCT mean-score increment exceeded the control group's increment (53.26 to 59.63 versus 54.14 to 55.34) — related
• Experimental-group students scored significantly higher than control students on the open-ended physics questionnaire — related
• Post-test reading comprehension means were 87.72 for the trained group versus 72.32 for the control group — related
• iPod inquiry teaching produced significantly more positive scientific attitudes than regular teaching for third graders — related
• iPod inquiry teaching produced significantly better air concept comprehension than regular teaching for third graders — related
• At post-test, the e-learning experimental group significantly outperformed the control group in scientific thinking — related