Post-test reading comprehension means were 87.72 for the trained group versus 72.32 for the control group¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? The experimental group's post-test mean (87.72, SD 1.76) exceeded the control group's (72.32, SD 2.35), with a reported t-test value of 13.41. → Mahmoud Sulaiman Hamad Bani Abdelrahman & Muwafaq Saleem Bsharah 2014

Evidence¶

Mahmoud Sulaiman Hamad Bani Abdelrahman & Muwafaq Saleem Bsharah 2014¶

Mahmoud Sulaiman Hamad Bani Abdelrahman & Muwafaq Saleem Bsharah. (2014). The Effect of Speed Reading Strategies on Developing Reading Comprehension among the 2nd Secondary Students in English Language. English Language Teaching, 7(6). http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v7n6p168

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Post-test results reported in Table 2 for the 21-student experimental and 21-student control groups: experimental mean 87.72 (SD 1.76), control mean 72.32 (SD 2.35), T.TEST 13.41, F 0.14. The article reports the experimental group showed the high level of reading comprehension.

"The results showed the high level of reading comprehension by the experimental group which appears from the means of both experimental and controlled groups."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• The experimental group's RCT mean-score increment exceeded the control group's increment (53.26 to 59.63 versus 54.14 to 55.34) — related
• Metacognitive strategy instruction improves EFL student-teachers' listening comprehension relative to traditional instruction — related
• Post-test reading comprehension means were 81.45 for the CIRC group versus 76.09 for the control group — related
• Experimental group mean scientific literacy score of 21.3967 versus control group mean of 11.8943 — related