Claims

Experts rated the CBT curriculum's overall implementation efficiency at the highest level, with contents rated highest quality

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q1
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? Expert evaluation found the overall efficiency of the CBT curriculum implementation was in the highest level, with contents rated highest among aspects. → Chaiwat Waree 2017

Evidence

Chaiwat Waree 2017

Chaiwat Waree. (2017). An Increasing of Primary School Teachers' Competency in Brain-Based Learning. International Education Studies, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v10n3p176

q1 · i? · causal · r1

Expert panel evaluation of the developed CBT curriculum, reported descriptively with no statistics. The article states contents had the highest quality, followed by training duration, evaluation, supporting documents, objectives, structure, and media.

"From the results of evaluation of experts on the efficiency of CBT curriculum implementation of primary teachers on brain-based learning management, it was found that, in overall, the efficiency of curriculum implementation was in the highest level."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.