Experts rate the implemented constructionism imagineering learning model via metaverse as appropriate at the highest level overall (Mean = 4.67, S.D. = 0.08)¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Experts rated the implemented model at the highest level overall (Mean = 4.67, S.D. = 0.08), with the possibility of implementation rated highest (4.86) and the process appropriateness rated High (4.43). → Sapliyan 2023

Evidence¶

Sapliyan 2023¶

Sapliyan, S., Chatwattana, P., & Nilsook, P. (2023). Constructionism Imagineering Learning Model via Metaverse to Enhance Young Innovators. Journal of Education and Learning, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v12n4p81

q2 · i? · design · r2

Expert assessment of the implemented model covering model appropriateness (Mean = 4.71), process appropriateness (Mean = 4.43, High), and possibility of implementation (Mean = 4.86). The article concludes the developed model "has the suitable elements, procedures, and processes to use as a development guideline."

"Table 6 Assessment results of the appropriateness of the constructionism imagineering learning model via metaverse to enhance young innovators, which was implemented. Overall, it is the highest appropriate (Mean = 4.67, S.D. = 0.08)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Experts rate the constructionism imagineering learning process via metaverse as appropriate at the highest level (Mean = 4.82, S.D. = 0.40) — related
• Experts rate the constructionism imagineering learning model via metaverse as appropriate at the highest level (Mean = 4.74, S.D. = 0.05) — related
• Experts rate the model's individual elements as appropriate at the highest level overall (Mean = 4.65, S.D. = 0.27), with learning achievement output rated High — related
• Eleven experts rated the tentative STEM-ICT instructional model as appropriate at a high level — related