Claims

Experts verbalized fewer SRL phases overall than novices during clinical reasoning, with feelings of uncertainty almost absent among experts

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 2 of 2 entries) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? A Fisher's Exact test revealed a significant difference in the frequency of SRL phases between experts and novices (p = 0.0005), with experts verbalizing fewer SRL phases overall. → Cloude 2025 q2 i? Only one expert verbalized feelings of uncertainty (<1% of codes), whereas each novice verbalized uncertainty almost 5% of the time. → Cloude 2025 (2)

Evidence

Cloude 2025

Cloude, E. B., Chapman, R., Azevedo, R., Castiglioni, A., LaRochelle, J., Hernandez, C., & Torre, D. (2025). Novice and expert self-regulated learning phase transitions in medical diagnosis: Implications for adaptive and intelligent systems. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-025-09729-4

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Group-comparison result (Fisher's Exact test) on coded think-aloud phase frequencies from n = 7 physicians and n = 27 medical students; the test was significant (p = 0.0005) and "Experts verbalized fewer SRL phases overall compared to novices". No effect size is printed.

"A Fisher’s Exact test revealed a significant difference in the frequency of SRL phases between experts and novices, p = 0.0005. Experts verbalized fewer SRL phases overall compared to novices"

Cloude 2025 (2)

Cloude, E. B., Chapman, R., Azevedo, R., Castiglioni, A., LaRochelle, J., Hernandez, C., & Torre, D. (2025). Novice and expert self-regulated learning phase transitions in medical diagnosis: Implications for adaptive and intelligent systems. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-025-09729-4

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Descriptive contrast in uncertainty verbalizations from the same think-aloud study: only one expert "verbalized Feeling uncertain (< 1%)", whereas each novice verbalized uncertainty almost 5% of the time. Percentages are descriptive; no test statistic accompanies this contrast.

"expert verbalized Feeling uncertain (< 1%), whereas each novice verbalized feeling uncer- tain almost 5% of the time."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id experts-fewer-srl-verbalizations-less-uncertainty
title Experts verbalized fewer SRL phases overall than novices during clinical reasoning, with feelings of uncertainty almost absent among experts
description Experts verbalized fewer SRL phases overall than novices during clinical reasoning, with feelings of uncertainty almost absent among experts
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2025
source_checked 2026-10-20
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — cloude-2025, cloude-2025-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.