Claims

Novices showed marginally higher complexity of SRL phase sequences than experts (frequent but predictable transitions), with no group differences in entropy or transition number

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Novices demonstrated more complexity in SRL phase sequences (Med = 0.83) than experts (Med = 0.78), a marginal difference (W = 140, p = 0.0539). → Cloude 2025 q2 i? There were no differences between groups in entropy or the number of transitions (ps > 0.05). → Cloude 2025 (2)

Evidence

Cloude 2025

Cloude, E. B., Chapman, R., Azevedo, R., Castiglioni, A., LaRochelle, J., Hernandez, C., & Torre, D. (2025). Novice and expert self-regulated learning phase transitions in medical diagnosis: Implications for adaptive and intelligent systems. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-025-09729-4

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Wilcoxon Sum Rank test comparing individual sequence characteristics between experts and novices; the complexity difference was marginal (p = 0.0539) with "Novices demonstrated more complexity in SRL phase sequences (Med = 0.83) compared to experts (Med = 0.78)". No effect size is printed.

"The results also revealed a marginal difference in the complexity of SRL phase dynamics between groups, W = 140, p = 0.0539. Novices demonstrated more complexity in SRL phase sequences (Med = 0.83) compared to experts (Med = 0.78)."

Cloude 2025 (2)

Cloude, E. B., Chapman, R., Azevedo, R., Castiglioni, A., LaRochelle, J., Hernandez, C., & Torre, D. (2025). Novice and expert self-regulated learning phase transitions in medical diagnosis: Implications for adaptive and intelligent systems. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-025-09729-4

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Null results from the same Wilcoxon comparisons: "There were no differences in entropy or the number of transitions between groups (ps > 0.05)". No effect sizes are printed, so equivalence was not tested.

"There were no differences in entropy or the number of transitions between groups (ps > 0.05)."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id novices-higher-srl-complexity-experts-moderate-diversity
title Novices showed marginally higher complexity of SRL phase sequences than experts (frequent but predictable transitions), with no group differences in entropy or transition number
description Novices showed marginally higher complexity of SRL phase sequences than experts (frequent but predictable transitions), with no group differences in entropy or transition number
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2025
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — cloude-2025, cloude-2025-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.