In Mnemosyne log data, exponential forgetting curve models that include a delay term perform comparably to 1PL-IRT, the best-performing benchmark model.¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr?·q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2019: tool and model accuracy changes quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Exponential forgetting models 5, 8, 10 and 13, which include the delay term, performed comparably to 1PL-IRT (model 3), the best benchmark among 0PL-IRT, 1PL-IRT and logistic regression; comparable performance was read from AUC curves and equivalence was not tested. → Reddy 2016
Evidence¶
Reddy 2016¶
Reddy, S., Labutov, I., Banerjee, S., & Joachims, T. (2016). Unbounded Human Learning: Optimal Scheduling for Spaced Repetition. KDD ’16, San Francisco, CA, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939850
q2 · i? · causal · r?
Observational study of Mnemosyne flashcard log data, comparing memory models by cross-validated validation AUC against benchmark models. Models including the delay term "perform comparably to 1PL-IRT (model 3), which is the best-performing benchmark model"; no AUC values are printed.
"Exponential for- getting models that include the delay term (models 5, 8, 10, and 13) perform comparably to 1PL-IRT (model 3), which is the best-performing benchmark model"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
-
The survey reports, citing Pavlik et al., that no single knowledge tracing model was always the best, and that a better model must consider multiple student features and the learning context. — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it
-
Memory-decay-based models fit fact-learning datasets better than models insensitive to memory decay — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it
- In Mnemosyne flashcard log data, adding a delay term improves the recall-prediction performance of exponential forgetting curve memory models. — related
- In Mnemosyne log data, item-specific difficulty parameters outperform a global difficulty for lower and higher Leitner decks, while global difficulty performs better for intermediate decks. — related
- In Mnemosyne log data, setting memory strength equal to an item's Leitner deck position predicts recall better than number of past reviews, which beats constant strength. — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
exponential-forgetting-models-with-delay-perform-comparably-to-1pl-irt |
title |
In Mnemosyne log data, exponential forgetting curve models that include a delay term perform comparably to 1PL-IRT, the best-performing benchmark model. |
description |
In Mnemosyne log data, exponential forgetting curve models that include a delay term perform comparably to 1PL-IRT, the best-performing benchmark model. |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2016 |
recheck_by |
2019 |
generated |
by claude/unspecified on 2026-09-24 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — reddy-2016 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.