In Mnemosyne log data, setting memory strength equal to an item's Leitner deck position predicts recall better than number of past reviews, which beats constant strength.¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2019: tool and model accuracy changes quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Memory strength set to Leitner deck position outperformed strength proportional to the number of past reviews, which in turn outperformed a constant strength, by validation and test AUC; no AUC values are printed in the text. → Reddy 2016
Evidence¶
Reddy 2016¶
Reddy, S., Labutov, I., Banerjee, S., & Joachims, T. (2016). Unbounded Human Learning: Optimal Scheduling for Spaced Repetition. KDD ’16, San Francisco, CA, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939850
q2 · i? · associational · r2
Observational study of Mnemosyne flashcard log data, comparing memory models by cross-validated validation AUC and a held-out test set. Setting strength to the "Leitner deck position qij performs better than setting it to be proportional to the number of past reviews nij", itself better than constant s (Fig. 3); no numbers printed.
"Setting the mem- ory strength s to be equal to the Leitner deck position qij performs better than setting it to be proportional to the number of past reviews nij, which in turn is better than using a constant s"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
-
Memory-decay-based models fit fact-learning datasets better than models insensitive to memory decay — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it
-
Under the Leitner Queue Network model, raising the rate of new-item introduction beyond a threshold causes a phase transition in learning rate, which a Mechanical Turk vocabulary experiment reproduced. — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it
- In Mnemosyne flashcard log data, adding a delay term improves the recall-prediction performance of exponential forgetting curve memory models. — related
- In Mnemosyne log data, item-specific difficulty parameters outperform a global difficulty for lower and higher Leitner decks, while global difficulty performs better for intermediate decks. — related
- In Mnemosyne log data, exponential forgetting curve models that include a delay term perform comparably to 1PL-IRT, the best-performing benchmark model. — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
leitner-deck-position-predicts-recall-better-than-review-count |
title |
In Mnemosyne log data, setting memory strength equal to an item's Leitner deck position predicts recall better than number of past reviews, which beats constant strength. |
description |
In Mnemosyne log data, setting memory strength equal to an item's Leitner deck position predicts recall better than number of past reviews, which beats constant strength. |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2016 |
recheck_by |
2019 |
generated |
by claude/unspecified on 2026-09-24 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — reddy-2016 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.