Claims

Deuchler et al. found learning occurs with EyeSi simulator training but is higher when combined with an online theory platform

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In Deuchler et al.'s pre-test/post-test study, learning was observed with EyeSi simulator training but was higher when students also trained on a theory-based online platform. → Dutt Deepaysh DCS 2025

Evidence

Dutt Deepaysh DCS 2025

Dutt Deepaysh DCS, Hohnen Harry, Kulshrestha Subham, Razavi Hessom. (2025). Simulation models in direct ophthalmoscopy education: a systematic review. Canadian Medical Education Journal. https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.79989

q2 · i? · review · r3

Pre-test/post-test study of 86 medical students reviewed within the systematic review, comparing EyeSi-only training with EyeSi plus EyeSiNet online platform. The review reports that "learning is observed with simulator training, but is higher if students trained on both a simulator and theory based online platform."

"Deuchler et al.39 conducted a pre-test and post-test on students after training with EyeSi Direct or with a combination of EyeSi direct and EyeSiNet for direct and indirect ophthalmoscopy and found that learning is observed with simulator training, but is higher if students trained on both a simulator and theory based online platform."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.