Claims

EyeSi virtual reality simulator training produces statistically higher OSCE scores than control in Boden et al.'s randomised trial

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In Boden et al.'s randomised controlled trial of the EyeSi Direct Ophthalmoscope Simulator, the simulation group had statistically higher OSCE scores than the control group, with high student satisfaction. → Dutt Deepaysh DCS 2025

Evidence

Dutt Deepaysh DCS 2025

Dutt Deepaysh DCS, Hohnen Harry, Kulshrestha Subham, Razavi Hessom. (2025). Simulation models in direct ophthalmoscopy education: a systematic review. Canadian Medical Education Journal. https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.79989

q2 · i? · review · r3

Randomised controlled trial of 34 medical students reviewed within the systematic review, evaluating the EyeSi DO simulator in an OSCE setting. Appendix A reports that the "Simulation group had statistically higher OSCE scores than the control group, and high satisfaction of students in the simulator group."

"Boden et al.38 evaluated the use of the EyeSi DO simulator in an OSCE setting. Students found that the model had high realism with its ability to imitate eye movements, blinking and pupil size."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.