Facilitating condition has no direct effect on actual use of MALL, departing from prior literature.¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? The path from facilitating condition to use behavior was not significant; its effect was fully mediated by behavioral intention. → Vo 2020

Evidence¶

Vo 2020¶

Vo, H. N. (2020). Understanding higher education learners' acceptance and use of mobile devices for language learning: A Rasch-based path modeling approach. Computers and Education, 146, Article 103761. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103761

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Path analysis of 293 Vietnamese learners found the facilitating condition to use behavior path was not significant, a departure from both original and modified UTAUT models.

"However, the standardized regression weight s from effort expectancy to behavioral intention and facilitating conditio n to use behavior were not significant."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Behavioral intention has a statistically significant but weak positive effect on actual MALL usage behavior in EFL learning — related
• Behavioral intention translates only weakly into self-reported use behavior, and the extended UTAUT model explains intention formation better than enactment — related
• Metacognitive knowledge and intentions to use effective strategies do not reliably translate into actual strategy use (intention-behavior gap) — related
• The modified UTAUT model accounts for 62% of variance in behavioral intention and 19% of variance in use behavior. — related