Claims

Familiarity with online and proctored exams, approximated by exam quartile, shows no effect on test anxiety

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The quartile of the exam, used as an approximation of familiarity, did not influence test anxiety. → Conijn 2022

Evidence

Conijn 2022

Conijn, R., Kleingeld, A., Matzat, U., & Snijders, C. (2022). The fear of big brother: The potential negative side-effects of proctored exams. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(6), 1521-1534. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12651

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Multi-level model M4 (Table 4) on test anxiety in online exams, using exam quartile (Q3–Q2) as an approximation of familiarity with online and proctored exams. The study reports "the quartile did not influence test anxiety (M4, Table 4)"; hypothesis 2.4 was not supported.

"Here we found that the quartile did not influence test anxiety (M4, Table 4). Hence, the more familiarity with online teaching and online exams did not result in lower test anxiety."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id familiarity-no-effect-test-anxiety
title Familiarity with online and proctored exams, approximated by exam quartile, shows no effect on test anxiety
description Familiarity with online and proctored exams, approximated by exam quartile, shows no effect on test anxiety
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2022
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-12
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — conijn-2022

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.