Claims

Proctored online exams show no effect on students' perceived exam difficulty

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Proctored and online exams showed no effect on reported levels of exam difficulty. → Conijn 2022

Evidence

Conijn 2022

Conijn, R., Kleingeld, A., Matzat, U., & Snijders, C. (2022). The fear of big brother: The potential negative side-effects of proctored exams. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(6), 1521-1534. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12651

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Multi-level regression with a random intercept for course (18% of variance at course level, p < 0.001) on survey data from 1760 students across 105 courses. The study found "no effect of online (p = 0.99) or proctored exams ( p = 0.56)"; hypothesis 1.2 was not supported.

"This model showed that there was no effect of online (p = 0.99) or proctored exams ( p = 0.56) on the reported levels of exam difficulty."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id proctoring-no-effect-exam-difficulty
title Proctored online exams show no effect on students' perceived exam difficulty
description Proctored online exams show no effect on students' perceived exam difficulty
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2022
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-12
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — conijn-2022

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.