Claims

Proctored online exams show no effect on students' exam performance

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? No fixed effects of online or proctored exams on exam grade were found once student and course effects were accounted for. → Conijn 2022

Evidence

Conijn 2022

Conijn, R., Kleingeld, A., Matzat, U., & Snijders, C. (2022). The fear of big brother: The potential negative side-effects of proctored exams. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(6), 1521-1534. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12651

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Crossed-random-intercepts multi-level model of final exam grades (available for 709 grades in a subset of 22 courses; 34% of variance at student level, 16% at course level). The study reports "no fixed effects were found for online ( p = 0.89) and proctoring ( p = 0.39)"; hypothesis 1.3 was not supported.

"While accounting for the course and student effects, no fixed effects were found for online ( p = 0.89) and proctoring ( p = 0.39)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id proctoring-no-effect-exam-performance
title Proctored online exams show no effect on students' exam performance
description Proctored online exams show no effect on students' exam performance
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2022
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-12
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — conijn-2022

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.