Claims

Before the FCI treatment, the experimental and control groups showed no statistically significant difference in writing ability

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Pre-test scores did not differ significantly between the experimental (x =4.35, N=34, SD=1.85) and control (x =4.64, N=32, SD=1.72) groups, T=-.653, P=0.51. → Ramyar O. Qader and Fadime Yalcin Arslan 2019

Evidence

Ramyar O. Qader and Fadime Yalcin Arslan 2019

Ramyar O. Qader and Fadime Yalcin Arslan. (2019). THE EFFECT OF FLIPPED CLASSROOM INSTRUCTION IN WRITING: A CASE STUDY WITH IRAQI EFL LEARNERS. Teaching English with Technology, 19(1), 36-55. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1204642

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Independent-sample t-test on pre-test writing scores in the quasi-experiment found no statistically significant difference between groups before treatment; equivalence was not tested beyond this non-significant comparison, and no effect size is printed.

"no statistically significant difference existed between the pre-tests of the experimental ( x =4.35, N=34, SD=1.85) and control groups ( x =4.64, N=32, SD=1.72) and (T=-.653, P=0.51)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.