Simulation feedback predicts sadness and neutral facial expressions and metacognitive judgement, but not perceived task difficulty¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Feedback significantly predicted facial expressions of sadness (b = -0.047, p < 0.01, R2 = 0.13) and neutrality (b = 0.28, p = 0.05, R2 = 0.18) and metacognitive judgement (b = 0.13, p < 0.05, R2 = 0.29). → Çini 2023 q2 i? Perception of task difficulty was not predicted by feedback (b = -0.010, p = 0.90, R2 = 0.005). → Çini 2023 (2)

Evidence¶

Çini 2023¶

Çini, A., Järvelä, S., Dindar, M., Malmberg, J. (2023). How multiple levels of metacognitive awareness operate in collaborative problem solving. Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-023-09358-7

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Three-level multilevel modelling (time, individual, group) of feedback events during the Tailorshop CPS task, with facial expressions from Azure Face API and situated self-reports. Feedback "predicted students’ facial expressions of “sadness”" and neutrality and metacognitive judgement.

"Feedback predicted students’ facial expressions of “sadness” (b = -0.047, SE = 0.002, t(671) = -2.96, p < 0.01, R2 = 0.13) and “neutral” (b = 0.28, SE = 0.014, t(618) = 1.91, p = 0.05, R2 = 0.18), and their metacognitive judgement (b = 0.13, SE = 0.058, t(235) = 1.94, p < 0.05, R2 = 0.29)."

Çini 2023 (2)¶

Çini, A., Järvelä, S., Dindar, M., Malmberg, J. (2023). How multiple levels of metacognitive awareness operate in collaborative problem solving. Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-023-09358-7

q2 · i? · associational · r2

In the same multilevel analysis of the CPS simulation data, "the perception of task difficulty was not predicted by feedback"; equivalence was not tested.

"However, the perception of task difficulty was not predicted by feedback (b = -0.010, SE = 0.088, t(232) = -0.12, p = 0.90, R2 = 0.005)."

Discussion¶

Learner Variables¶

• Metacognition — outcome: instruction changes it

Related Claims¶

• Prior coding experience correlates positively with digital literacy and coding comfort and negatively with perceived task difficulty — related
• Metacognitive judgement positively predicts perceived individual performance in CPS, which mediates perceived group performance — related
• In a within-subject user study, participants showed longer positive facial expressions under the emotion-aware (Emotion ON) tutoring condition — related
• Three emotion profiles (positive, neutral, negative) differ in prediction and postdiction magnitude and accuracy, with the positive group most overconfident in predictions and least underconfident in postdictions — related