Metacognitive judgement positively predicts perceived individual performance in CPS, which mediates perceived group performance¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · checked against its sources 2026-10-19 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Situated metacognitive judgement has a positive direct effect on perceived individual performance (β = 0.65, p < 0.01) and an indirect effect on perceived group performance via perceived individual performance. → Çini 2023

Evidence¶

Çini 2023¶

Çini, A., Järvelä, S., Dindar, M., Malmberg, J. (2023). How multiple levels of metacognitive awareness operate in collaborative problem solving. Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-023-09358-7

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Structural equation modelling of data from 77 higher education students collaborating on the Tailorshop CPS simulation, with situated self-reports of metacognitive judgement. The model showed "a positive relationship between perceived individual performance and metacognitive judgement (β = 0.65, p < 0.01)".

"SEM yielded a positive relationship between perceived individual performance and metacognitive judgement (β = 0.65, p < 0.01). An indirect relationship was also observed between metacognitive judgement and an individual’s perceived group performance through the mediation of per -ceived individual performance."

Discussion¶

Learner Variables¶

• Metacognition — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
• Self-Regulation — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes

Related Claims¶

• Simulation feedback predicts sadness and neutral facial expressions and metacognitive judgement, but not perceived task difficulty — related
• Trait metacognitive awareness positively predicts perceived group performance while perceived task difficulty negatively predicts it — related