A feedback provision scaffold of prompts plus a sample solution significantly improves the quality of feedback messages pre-service teachers provide on peers' case analyses¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr3·q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Pre-service teachers who received a feedback provision scaffold formulated higher-quality feedback messages than those without it. → Julia Hornstein 2025
Evidence¶
Julia Hornstein 2025¶
Julia Hornstein, Martin Greisel, Ingo Kollar. (2025). Promoting Pre-Service Teachers' Evidence-Informed Reasoning Through Peer-Feedback: Effects of a Feedback Provision Scaffold and a Feedback Integration Scaffold. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-025-09745-4
q3 · i? · causal · r3
Linear mixed model in the randomized 2×2 experiment (N = 254) predicting feedback quality provided, with own and peers' initial case analysis quality as covariates; the article reports a "statistically significant and positive" scaffold effect, with descriptively higher means with the scaffold (M = 0.44) than without (M = 0.24).
"The effect of the feedback provision scaffold was statistically significant and positive. Thus, Hypothesis 1 was confirmed."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Instructional support improves quality of feedback provision (g = 0.64) and quality of feedback reception (g = 0.49) but not subject-matter-related knowledge — a broader claim this one bears on
- Neither scaffold significantly improves pre-service teachers' EIR application skills — related
- During feedback provision, content-specific support improves feedback provision quality (g = 0.75) but not knowledge, while generic support improves both provision quality (g = 0.70) and subject-matter-related knowledge (g = 0.55) — a broader claim this one bears on
- Feedback provision support improves quality of feedback provision (g = 0.72) and quality of feedback reception (g = 0.69) but not subject-matter-related knowledge — a broader claim this one bears on
- Pre-service teachers who received NLP-based adaptive feedback were better able to justify their diagnoses than those who received static feedback (reported from Sailer et al.) — related
- Neither content-specific nor generic support during feedback reception shows significant effects on feedback reception quality or subject-matter-related knowledge, but the evidence base is too small to interpret — related
- Feedback quality provided correlates positively with both EIR recognition and EIR application skills — related
- Dissociation between scaffolding quality and retrospective reasoning: experienced teachers scaffold better but reason less advanced about student thinking — related
- Adaptive feedback outperforms generic feedback for pre-service teachers' noticing in a virtual classroom — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
feedback-provision-scaffold-improves-feedback-quality |
title |
A feedback provision scaffold of prompts plus a sample solution significantly improves the quality of feedback messages pre-service teachers provide on peers' case analyses |
description |
A feedback provision scaffold of prompts plus a sample solution significantly improves the quality of feedback messages pre-service teachers provide on peers' case analyses |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2025 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — julia-hornstein-2025 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.