Claims

Applying feedback correlates positively and ignoring feedback negatively with creativity acquisition

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 In the IF group, ignored feedback correlated negatively (r = −0.641) and applied feedback positively (r = 0.473) with fluency acquisition. → Junting Yin 2025

Evidence

Junting Yin 2025

Junting Yin, Zheyu Jin, Yuxuan Zhang, Xuening Li, Yangzhuo Li, Guoping Zhang & Junlong Luo. (2025). Applying, not ignoring: how feedback uptake and neural synchrony drive creativity. npj Science of Learning 10:61. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-025-00351-0

q3 · i3 · causal · r2

Pearson correlation analyses (FDR-corrected) linking coded feedback uptake to creativity change in the IF group. Ignoring feedback correlated negatively with fluency acquisition (printed r = −0.641); applied feedback correlated positively with fluency (r = 0.473) and uniqueness (r = 0.504) acquisition.

"the amount of feedback ignored (r = −0.641; pcorr = 0.003) and the percentage of feedback ignored (r = −0.627; pcorr = 0.003) were significantly negatively correlated withfluency acquisi- tion"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.