Claims

Interpersonal feedback induced higher interpersonal neural synchronization in superior frontal gyrus and inferior parietal cortex channels than control conditions

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 INS at CH6–CH14 (covering lSFG and rIPC) was significantly higher in the IF group than in NF, IC, and OF groups (η2P = 0.218). → Junting Yin 2025

Evidence

Junting Yin 2025

Junting Yin, Zheyu Jin, Yuxuan Zhang, Xuening Li, Yangzhuo Li, Guoping Zhang & Junlong Luo. (2025). Applying, not ignoring: how feedback uptake and neural synchrony drive creativity. npj Science of Learning 10:61. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-025-00351-0

q3 · i3 · causal · r2

One-way ANOVAs on fNIRS hyperscanning INS in task-relevant frequency bands across four groups, with printed effect size η2P = 0.218. IF INS (0.07 ± 0.08) exceeded NF (−0.06 ± 0.10), IC, and OF; a permutation test confirmed the effect was specific to real dyads.

"the results revealed significant variation in INS at CH6 –CH14 (FOI 1) among the four groups ( F(3, 95) = 8.840, pcorr = 0.047; η2 P = 0.218)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.