Claims

Interpersonal feedback uniquely enhanced bidirectional neural information flow between provider and receiver

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i2 A Group × Direction ANOVA on GCA values at CH6–CH14 showed a significant group effect (η2P = 0.134) and interaction (η2P = 0.087); only IF exceeded NF in the receiver→provider direction. → Junting Yin 2025

Evidence

Junting Yin 2025

Junting Yin, Zheyu Jin, Yuxuan Zhang, Xuening Li, Yangzhuo Li, Guoping Zhang & Junlong Luo. (2025). Applying, not ignoring: how feedback uptake and neural synchrony drive creativity. npj Science of Learning 10:61. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-025-00351-0

q3 · i2 · causal · r2

Granger causality analysis of fNIRS signals between providers and receivers, with printed effect size η2P = 0.134 for the group main effect. The article concludes IF uniquely enhances bidirectional information flow, while OF primarily strengthens provider→receiver influence (p = 0.013 for that direction contrast).

"a 4 (Group: IF, OF, IC, NF) × 2 (Direction: provider→ receiver, receiver→ provider) mixed-design ANOVA revealed as i g n ificant main effect of group (F(3, 96) = 4.951, p = 0.003, η2 P =0 . 1 3 4 )"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.