Claims

Improvement in Orthopaedic In-Training Examination scores showed no significant correlation with OSCE scores

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2027: tool and model accuracy changes quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Over two years, mean OITE scores improved significantly but OITE improvement did not correlate significantly with OSCE scores. → El Sherif Reem 2024

Evidence

El Sherif Reem 2024

El Sherif Reem, Shrier Ian, Paul-Tellier Pierre, Rodriguez Charo. (2024). What do we know about Objective Structured Clinical Examination in Sport and Exercise Medicine? A scoping review. Canadian Medical Education Journal. https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.77841

q2 · i? · review · r2

Comparison of nine orthopedics residents in competency-based curriculum exams including OSCEs against the computer-based OITE over two years, reported via the review. It found "no significant correlation between OITE improvement and OSCE scores"; no correlation coefficient is printed.

"The authors reported a significant improvement in mean OITE scores between the two years, but no significant correlation between OITE improvement and OSCE scores."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.