Upper basic students taught Basic Technology practical skills via field trip scored higher on a post-test than students taught by expository method¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Students taught using field trip had a higher post-test mean score (45.040) than students taught using the expository method (35.240). → Amosa 2013 (2)
q2 i? The ANCOVA comparison of experimental and control groups led the authors to reject the null hypothesis of no difference. → Amosa 2013 (2)
Evidence¶
Amosa 2013¶
Amosa, A. G. A., Ogunlade, O. O., & Atobatele, A. S. (2013). Effect of Field Trip on Students' Academic Performance in Basic Technology in Ilorin Metropolis, Nigeria. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 3(2). https://www.mojet.net
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Quasi-experimental, non-equivalent pre-test post-test control group study of 50 upper basic students in two Ilorin schools, randomly assigned to field trip (n=25) or expository (n=25) groups. Descriptive post-test means show "The mean score (45.040) of the students taught using field trip was higher" than the control mean of 35.240.
"The mean score (45.040) of the students taught using field trip was higher than the mean score (35.240) of the students taught using expository method."
Amosa 2013 (2)¶
Amosa, A. G. A., Ogunlade, O. O., & Atobatele, A. S. (2013). Effect of Field Trip on Students' Academic Performance in Basic Technology in Ilorin Metropolis, Nigeria. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 3(2). https://www.mojet.net
q2 · i? · causal · r1
ANCOVA on post-test scores of the experimental and control groups, as reported in Table 3 of the Results section. The article reports the value produced and rejects hypothesis one, though the printed F and significance figures are presented in an unconventional format.
"From Table 3, it is shown that at 0.05 significant levels, the value produced F = (2,22)3.440 >0.109."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Among students taught Basic Technology via field trip, male and female post-test performance did not differ in the authors' conclusion, though the article also reports a significant difference — related
- Teaching Arabic oral skills with a Virtual Trip Model produces significantly higher post-test achievement than traditional teaching among third graders — related
- Students who experienced the virtual field trip via a 3D HMD scored higher on a delayed posttest roughly three weeks later than 2D-video students — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.