Claims

Among students taught Basic Technology via field trip, male and female post-test performance did not differ in the authors' conclusion, though the article also reports a significant difference

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Female students taught via field trip had a post-test mean of 45.8333 and male students 44.3077. → Amosa 2013 q2 i? The ANCOVA for male and female field trip students led the authors to reject hypothesis two, yet the conclusion states gender is not a factor. → Amosa 2013 (2)

Evidence

Amosa 2013

Amosa, A. G. A., Ogunlade, O. O., & Atobatele, A. S. (2013). Effect of Field Trip on Students' Academic Performance in Basic Technology in Ilorin Metropolis, Nigeria. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 3(2). https://www.mojet.net

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Descriptive comparison of post-test means for the field trip group by gender (female n=12, male n=13) reported in Table 2. The article states the performance "proved there was difference", with means of 45.8333 for female and 44.3077 for male students.

"the performance of male and female students when they were taught using field trip proved there was difference. The table revealed that male and female students had a range of (44.3077) and (45.8333) respectively."

Amosa 2013 (2)

Amosa, A. G. A., Ogunlade, O. O., & Atobatele, A. S. (2013). Effect of Field Trip on Students' Academic Performance in Basic Technology in Ilorin Metropolis, Nigeria. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 3(2). https://www.mojet.net

q2 · i? · causal · r1

ANCOVA on post-test scores of male and female students taught using field trip, reported in Table 4. The article uses this result to reject hypothesis two, while the table also prints a non-significant gender effect (Sig. .946 for Male).

"The analysis in Table 4 indicated that F (2, 9) = 4.26 > 0.433 at the .05 level of significance."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.