Within individual assignment types, Fisher exact tests show almost no difference between experimental and control groups¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Fisher exact tests on each of the five assignment types produced p-values from 0.2094611 to 0.6454394, indicating almost no difference in proportions within strata. → Chainikova 2018
Evidence¶
Chainikova 2018¶
Chainikova, G.R., Zatonskiy, A.V., Mitiukov, N.W., Busygina, H.L. (2018). Development of Foreign Language Lexical Competence on the Basis of a Learner’s Terminological Thesaurus and Dictionary. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2018.1.51
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Within-strata Fisher exact tests in the same pedagogical experiment (17 experimental, 15 control students) gave non-significant p-values for each assignment type, e.g. "Fisher test p-value: 0.6454394" for lexical assignments without a communication situation; the authors conclude there is "almost no difference in the proportions within strata".
"Fisher test allows to check how efficient the method is within strata: Lexical assignments without any communication situation Fisher test p-value: 0.6454394 Writing out key words from the text Fisher test p-value: 0.5887097"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- A significantly higher proportion of students passed college algebra in the scientific heuristic group than in the direct instruction group — related
- A larger proportion of game-playing students showed positive score change than control students on adaptability and resourcefulness, but not significantly on communication — related
- Experts verbalized fewer SRL phases overall than novices during clinical reasoning, with feelings of uncertainty almost absent among experts — related
- Using the Learner's terminological thesaurus and dictionary yields a statistically significant pooled advantage over regular instruction in lexical-skill outcomes — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.