Claims

Flipped classroom instruction is associated with higher student satisfaction than traditional instruction in medical education (SMD 0.82).

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i2 Across 27 studies with 5,842 participants, flipped classroom instruction produced significantly higher student satisfaction scores than traditional instruction (SMD 0.82, 95% CI 0.45-1.19, P<.001). → de Azevedo Cardoso T 2025

Evidence

de Azevedo Cardoso T 2025

de Azevedo Cardoso T, Aung H H, Yeh W-Y, Ozdamli F, Ignjatovic A, Spaic D, Bukumiric Z, Rajovic N, Markovic K, Savic M, Milin-Lazovic J, Grubor N, Milic N, Stanisavljevic D, Despotovic A, Bokonjic D, Vladicic Masic J, Janicijevic V, Masic S, Milic N. (2025). The Flipped Classroom in Medical Education: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research. https://doi.org/10.2196/60757

q3 · i2 · quant-synthesis · r2

Meta-analysis of 27 studies (5,842 participants) reporting student satisfaction scores. The pooled SMD of 0.82 (95% CI 0.45-1.19) indicates a large effect favoring the flipped classroom, with the FC group outperforming approximately 72% of control individuals.

"The results of the meta-analysis overall effect showed higher students’ satisfaction scores for an FC in contrast to the control group (SMD 0.82, 95% CI 0.45-1.19; P<.001"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.