Claims

Flipped classroom effects do not differ significantly between theoretical and practical knowledge, though practical knowledge shows a slightly larger effect

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The inter-group test for knowledge type was not significant (p = 0.664), so no significant difference existed between theoretical (SMD = 0.63) and practical (SMD = 0.70) knowledge outcomes. → Zhang 2021

Evidence

Zhang 2021

Zhang, Q., Cheung, E.S.T., & Cheung, C.S.T. (2021). The impact of flipped classroom on college students’ academic performance: A meta-analysis based on 20 experimental studies. Science Insights Education Frontiers, 8(2):1059-1080. https://doi.org/10.15354/sief.21.re019

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Moderator analysis of knowledge type across the included studies (Table 3): both theoretical (16 datasets, SMD = 0.63) and practical (12 datasets, SMD = 0.70) effects were positive and significant (Z = 8.137, p = 0.000), but the between-group difference was not significant. Equivalence was not formally tested beyond the QBET test.

"From the inter-group affect test results, p = 0.664 > 0.05, which did not reach the significant level. Therefore, no significant difference existed in the impact of flipped classroom on academic knowledge and practical performance."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.