Claims

Flipped learning reduces but does not eradicate writer's block in ESP business students relative to traditional teaching

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Experimental-group students showed significantly lower writer's block than controls on the QIWB total (t = 12.82, p = .00) and on its subscales, but block was alleviated rather than eliminated. → Salem 2018

Evidence

Salem 2018

Salem, A. A. M. S. (2018). Engaging ESP University Students in Flipped Classrooms for Developing Functional Writing Skills, HOTs, and Eliminating Writer's Block. English Language Teaching, 11(12). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n12p177

q2 · i? · causal · r1

T-test comparison on Rose's QIWB (24 items, five subscales) in the quasi-experiment. Table 11 reports total means of 42.23 (experimental) vs 59.76 (control), t = 12.82, p = .00; the article states "the levels of writers' block have been alleviated but it was not eradicated".

"Table 11 revealed that the level of writer's block of the experimental group students has decreased relatively compared with the level of control group students."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.