Claims

Flipped learning improves higher-order thinking skills (analyzing, evaluating, creating) of college business ESP students more than traditional teaching

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Experimental-group students scored significantly higher than controls on analyzing, evaluating, and creating, and on total HOTs (t = 6.95, p = .00). → Salem 2018

Evidence

Salem 2018

Salem, A. A. M. S. (2018). Engaging ESP University Students in Flipped Classrooms for Developing Functional Writing Skills, HOTs, and Eliminating Writer's Block. English Language Teaching, 11(12). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n12p177

q2 · i? · causal · r1

T-test analysis of the HOTs performance test (75 points across analysis, evaluation, creation) in the same quasi-experiment. Table 10 reports total means of 51.53 (experimental) vs 37.48 (control), t = 6.95, p = .00, with subskill t values of 7.24, 6.26, and 5.18, all p = .00.

"Table 10 shows that implementing flipped leaning practices improved the higher-order thinking skills of the college business students in the experimental group, namely, analyzing, evaluating, and creating."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.