Claims

Flipped classroom instruction produces higher functional writing skills than traditional teaching among third-year ESP business majors

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Experimental-group business majors scored significantly higher than control-group peers on total functional writing skills (t = 4.61, p = .00) and on each of the four subskills. → Salem 2018

Evidence

Salem 2018

Salem, A. A. M. S. (2018). Engaging ESP University Students in Flipped Classrooms for Developing Functional Writing Skills, HOTs, and Eliminating Writer's Block. English Language Teaching, 11(12). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n12p177

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Quasi-experiment with 51 third-year business majors (26 experimental, 25 control) taught functional writing via flipped sessions or traditional lectures. Table 9 reports total-score means of 75.61 (experimental) vs 61.56 (control), t = 4.61, p = .00, with subskill t values from 3.56 to 5.08, all significant. The study reports "relatively high gains" for the flipped group.

"Close inspection of Table 9 reveals that non-English majors business students in the experimental group achieved relatively high gains in using functional writing skills compared with their counterparts in the control group"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.