Claims

Classroom participation was rated significantly higher in the flipped project-based class than in the control class

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Participation in classroom rose from a control-class mean of 3.45 to an experimental-class mean of 4.65, which the article calls a significant improvement. → Deng 2018

Evidence

Deng 2018

Lijun Deng. (2018). The Project-Based Flipped Learning Model in Business English Translation Course: Learning, Teaching and Assessment. English Language Teaching, 11(9). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n9p118

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Questionnaire participation domain from the same post-experiment survey of both classes; means of 4.65 (experimental) versus 3.45 (control) are printed with SDs of 0.36 and 0.21. No test statistic accompanies this domain.

"The participation of students in classroom has also witnessed a significant improvement from a mean of 3.45 of the control class to a mean of 4.65 of the experimental class."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.